| 140 | 0 | 77 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
基于中国海事局144份船舶自沉事故调查报告,通过事故原因频次统计筛选25项基本事件,运用风险矩阵法量化风险等级,直接识别关键因素。结合致因链分析并专家评审,构建事故树模型,揭示事故演化逻辑,并转化为贝叶斯网络模型,通过双模型联合,推演关键致因路径。研究表明:船舶自沉的核心直接因素包括恶劣天气海况船体锈蚀/破损,冒险航行、未履行报告义务及非法采砂/运输活动等人为因素尤为突出。具体致因链如下:物理链方面,恶劣天气/船体老化导致结构破损进水,叠加应急响应失效引发自沉;人为链方面,非法作业驱动冒险航行,并叠加安全管理缺失加剧险情失控,最终导致致沉。事故树与贝叶斯网络耦合揭示了多因素动态作用机制,为复杂海事事故致因研究提供了新视角。研究结果可为船舶安全设计优化、高风险作业监管及航行制度完善提供依据。
Abstract:Based on 144 investigation reports of ship self-sinking accidents by China Maritime Safety Administration, this study screened 25 basic events through accident cause frequency statistics, and directly identified key factors by quantifying risk level using risk matrix method. Combined with causal chain analysis and expert review, the accident tree model was constructed to reveal the accident evolution logic and transformed into a Bayesian network model to jointly deduce the key causal paths through the dual model. The core finding is that the core direct factors of ship self-sinking are severe weather and sea condition and hull corrosion/damage. The human factors, such as risky navigation, failure to fulfil the reporting obligation and illegal sand mining/transportation activities, are particularly prominent. The specific causal chains are as follows: physical chain-severe weather/hull deterioration leading to structural damage and water ingress, superimposed on the failure of emergency response to cause self-sinking; human chain-illegal operation driving risky voyage, superimposed on the lack of safety management to exacerbate the risk of loss of control and ultimately lead to sinking. In terms of methodology, the coupling of accident tree and Bayesian network reveals the dynamic mechanism of multi-factors, which provides a new perspective for the study of the causes of complex maritime accidents. The research results can provide a basis for the optimisation of ship safety design, the supervision of high-risk operations and the improvement of navigation system.
[1] 2023年交通运输行业发展统计公报 [J].现代城市轨道交通,2024,(7):139.
[2] 交通运输部关于修改《水上交通事故统计办法》的决定[J].中华人民共和国国务院公报,2021,(33):54-58.
[3] 乔卫亮,杨家豪,马晓雪.中国水域船舶自沉事故统计分析 [J].世界海运,2024,47 (05):12-19.
[4] 张苏,聂晓琴,高梦瑶,等.2013—2023年我国船舶自沉事故统计与规律分析 [J].工业安全与环保,2025,51 (05):45-50.
[5] 李奕良.基于贝叶斯网络的干散货船舶自沉事故致因分析[D].大连:大连海事大学,2020.
[6] 韩俊松,吴宛青,杜嘉立,等.中国沿海固体散货运输船自沉事故分析与对策 [J].中国航海,2014,37 (01):82-86.
[7] 张笛,梁峥,范存龙,等.基于贝叶斯网络的船舶自沉事故后果预测 [J].中国航海,2018,41(01):53-9.
[8] 崔秀芳,邵志鹏,赖炜祺,等.融合N-K模型的复杂网络船舶自沉事故风险因素耦合分析 [J].安全与环境学报,2024,24 (09):3307-3314.
[9] ESKI ?,TAVACIOGLU L.A combined method for the evaluation of contributing factors to maritime dangerous goods transport accidents [J].Brodogradnja,2024,75(4):1-20.
[10] 阮欣,尹志逸,陈艾荣.风险矩阵评估方法研究与工程应用综述 [J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2013,41 (3):381-385.
[11] 张爱然.事故树分析法中基本事件发生概率的确定 [J].能源技术与管理,2016,41(2):134-136.
[12] 卜全民,王涌涛,汪德爟.事故树分析法的应用研究 [J].西南石油大学学报,2007,(4):141-144,200.
[13] 陈锦标,陈婷婷,应士君,等.基于事故树分析的深水工作船作业安全管理 [J].中国航海,2012,35(2):45-49.
[14] 唐蓉,盛进路.基于贝叶斯网络的船舶自沉事故致因分析[J].广州航海学院学报,2023,31(2):18-22.
[15] 余静,蒋惠园,胡佳颖.基于贝叶斯网络的浙江沿海船舶通航风险分析 [J].中国航海,2018,41(2):97-101.
[16] 王德岭,刘以俊.基于事故树分析和贝叶斯网络的海上平台穿刺风险分析[J].上海海事大学学报,2025,46(3):129-136.
基本信息:
DOI:10.27015/j.cnki.cn.44-1713-u.20260120.004
中图分类号:U698.6
引用信息:
[1]张丹,余庆兵,张富群,等.基于FTA-BN模型的船舶自沉事故致因分析[J].广州航海学院学报,2025,33(04):28-34+10.DOI:10.27015/j.cnki.cn.44-1713-u.20260120.004.
2025-07-10
2025
2025-10-17
2025
1
2026-01-21
2026-01-21
2026-01-21